AUTHOR'S GUIDELINE

Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences (BEPLS)

The Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences (BEPLS) is a monthly, peer-reviewed, open-access international journal dedicated to the rapid publication of high-quality research in the fields of Environmental sciences, Pharmacology, Biomedical sciences, Agricultural and Life sciences.

BEPLS is the official publication of the Academy for Environment and Life Sciences, registered under the Societies Registration Act XXI of 1860.

The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, mini-reviews, short communications, research notes, and case studies covering a broad range of disciplines, including:

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial assessment followed by double-blind peer review. Manuscripts are considered for publication based on their scientific quality, originality, methodological rigor, validity of data, reproducibility, ethical compliance, and relevance to the journal's readership.

The journal accepts manuscripts on the condition that they have not been published previously and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

AIM OF THE JOURNAL

The aim of BEPLS is to provide a comprehensive international platform for the dissemination of high-quality scientific research and to promote advances in environmental, pharmaceutical, biomedical, agricultural, and life sciences across a broad spectrum of scientific disciplines.

EDITORIAL POLICY

Originality

Authors are expected to maintain the highest standards of scientific integrity and publication ethics. Manuscripts will be evaluated on the basis of:

Originality and scientific significance
Quality and validity of the research
Appropriate study design and methodology
Reliability and reproducibility of results
Ethical compliance
Clarity of presentation
Relevance to the journal's scope and readership

Authors must ensure that the submitted manuscript represents original work and that all sources of information are appropriately acknowledged and cited.

Authorship

All individuals listed as authors must have made a substantial contribution to the research and must have approved the final version of the manuscript.

All authors must agree to:

The final version of the manuscript.
The order and presentation of author's names.
The designation of the corresponding author.
The content and scientific integrity of the manuscript.

The corresponding author is responsible for communication with the journal throughout the editorial, peer-review, and publication processes and should ensure that all authors are appropriately informed.

Any change in authorship after submission-including addition, deletion, or change in the order of authors-must be justified and supported by written consent from all authors concerned. Such changes will be considered in accordance with applicable Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) principles.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

BEPLS follows strict standards of publication ethics and research integrity. Authors are responsible for ensuring that their manuscripts comply with applicable ethical, legal, and institutional requirements.

Authors must ensure that all text, data, figures, tables, photographs, and other materials presented in the manuscript are original or appropriately cited and used with the necessary permissions.

Where copyrighted or previously published material is reproduced, appropriate permission and citation must be provided.

When applicable, manuscripts should contain a separate section entitled "Compliance with Ethical Standards" addressing the following:

Conflict of Interest
Ethics Approval for Human and Animal Research
Informed Consent

Human Subject Research

Research involving human participants must receive approval from the appropriate Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), Institutional Review Board (IRB), or relevant national/regulatory ethics committee, as applicable.

The manuscript should clearly state:

The name of the approving ethics committee or institutional body.
The ethics approval/reference number, where applicable.
That the research was conducted in accordance with applicable ethical standards.
That informed consent was obtained from participants where required.

The privacy, confidentiality, and rights of human participants must be protected at all times.

Animal Research

Studies involving experimental animals must comply with applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

The manuscript should provide:

The name of the approving ethics committee.
The relevant approval/reference number, where applicable.
Details of applicable animal welfare guidelines.
Appropriate information regarding animal housing and experimental procedures.
Details of anesthesia, analgesia, euthanasia, and humane endpoints, where applicable.

Experimental procedures should be designed to minimize pain, distress, and unnecessary use of animals.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent must be obtained from human participants before their inclusion in research when required by the study design and applicable ethical standards.

For manuscripts containing identifiable personal information, photographs, clinical details, or other potentially identifiable participant information, authors must obtain appropriate consent for publication.

Authors must ensure that participants' privacy and confidentiality are protected.

PLAGIARISM PREVENTION POLICY

BEPLS is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record and promoting responsible research and publication practices.

Submitted manuscripts may be screened using plagiarism-detection software, such as Turnitin or other appropriate similarity-detection systems.

Manuscripts identified as containing plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabricated material, or other forms of publication misconduct may be rejected or subjected to further investigation and appropriate editorial action.

PUBLICATION TIMELINE

BEPLS aims to provide an efficient editorial and peer-review process. The journal endeavors to publish accepted articles within approximately One months, subject to the completion of peer review, revisions, editorial decisions, production, and author proof correction.

Publication timelines may vary depending on the complexity of the manuscript and the peer-review process.

MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION

Manuscripts should be submitted in English through the journal's designated online submission system or official editorial communication channel.

A cover letter should accompany the manuscript and should be submitted by the corresponding author.

For editorial correspondence:

Email: editorBELS@gmail.com

Authors should ensure that the manuscript complies with the journal's formatting, ethical, and submission requirements before submission.

ONLINE SUBMISSION AND MANUSCRIPT IDENTIFICATION

The editorial office aims to provide a manuscript identification number within approximately 3-7 working days after successful submission, subject to initial editorial screening and verification of submission details.

PEER-REVIEW PROCESS

BEPLS follows a double-blind peer-review process, wherever applicable.

Submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial assessment to determine their suitability for the journal. Manuscripts considered appropriate for further evaluation are sent to qualified reviewers with relevant subject expertise.

The final editorial decision may include:

Accept
Minor Revision
Major Revision
Reject

The journal reserves the right to reject manuscripts that fall outside its scope or fail to meet required standards of scientific quality, ethical compliance, originality, or methodological rigor.

TYPES OF MANUSCRIPTS AND RECOMMENDED LENGTH

Manuscript Type	Recommended Maximum Length
Original Research Article	8 pages
Review Article	15 pages
Short Communication	3 pages
Research Note	3 pages
Case Study/Case Report	3 pages

Recommended formatting: Cambria, 10-point font, with appropriate line spacing and consistent formatting throughout the manuscript.

Authors should prioritize scientific clarity and completeness rather than unnecessarily restricting the manuscript to a specified page count.

PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPTS

Manuscripts should be prepared in clear, concise, and scientifically appropriate English using a standard word-processing program.

Unless otherwise specified by the journal, manuscripts should be formatted with:

Consistent font and heading styles
Appropriate margins
Continuous page numbering
Line numbering, where applicable
Clearly identified tables and figures
Standard scientific terminology and SI units

Authors should ensure that the manuscript is carefully proofread before submission.

REPORTING GUIDELINES

Authors are encouraged to follow appropriate reporting guidelines, including:

CONSORT - Randomized controlled trials

PRISMA - Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

STROBE - Observational studies

CARE - Case reports

ARRIVE - Animal research

STARD - Diagnostic accuracy studies

TITLE PAGE

The title should be concise, specific, informative, and representative of the study.

The title page should include:

Full title of the manuscript
Full names of all authors
Institutional affiliations
Department and institution
City, country
Corresponding author's mailing address
Corresponding author's email address
ORCID iD, where available
Short running title of not more than 40 characters

The institutional affiliation should indicate the organization where the research was primarily conducted.

ABSTRACT

The abstract should be written in clear and concise scientific English and should generally not exceed 250-300 words.

The abstract should accurately reflect the study and should not contain information that is not presented in the main manuscript.

Keywords: A maximum of 7 keywords should be provided immediately below the abstract. Keywords should be specific and relevant to the manuscript.

INTRODUCTION

The Introduction should:

Provide the scientific background and rationale for the study.
Briefly summarize relevant previous research.
Identify the research gap or problem.
Clearly state the objectives or hypotheses of the study.

The Introduction should be concise and focused and should avoid an unnecessary or extensive literature review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Materials and Methods section should provide sufficient detail to enable other researchers to understand, reproduce, and validate the study.

Authors should describe:

Study design
Study setting and duration
Experimental materials
Participants or experimental animals, where applicable
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, where applicable
Sampling procedures
Experimental protocols
Chemicals and reagents
Equipment and instruments
Manufacturer details where scientifically relevant
Statistical methods
Ethical approval and consent, where applicable

Previously published methods may be described briefly with appropriate references. Any significant modifications to established methods should be clearly stated.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical methods must be appropriate for the study design and type of data.

Authors should report:

Number of observations/sample size (n)
Mean and appropriate measures of variability, such as SD or SEM
Statistical tests used
Assumptions or conditions relevant to the statistical test, where appropriate
Level of statistical significance
Exact or appropriate p-values, where applicable
Software used for statistical analysis, including version where relevant

Where multiple statistical tests are used, authors should clearly specify which tests were applied to which variables or groups.

RESULTS

The Results section should present the findings clearly and logically.

Results should be supported by appropriate:

Tables
Figures
Statistical analyses
Effect estimates or confidence intervals, where appropriate

Data presented in tables and figures should not be unnecessarily repeated in the text. The text should emphasize the major findings and their scientific relevance.

DISCUSSION

The Discussion should interpret the major findings in relation to:

The objectives of the study
Previous scientific literature
Biological or clinical relevance
Possible mechanisms
Strengths and limitations of the study
Implications for future research

The Discussion should not simply repeat the Results.

CONCLUSION

The Conclusion should provide a concise statement of the principal findings and their implications.

Conclusions should be supported by the data presented in the manuscript and should avoid unsupported claims or excessive generalization.

REVIEW ARTICLES

Review articles should provide a comprehensive and critical assessment of the relevant literature. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses should follow appropriate reporting standards such as PRISMA, where applicable, and should describe the search strategy, databases, eligibility criteria and study-selection process.

TABLES

Tables should be:

Numbered consecutively.
Provided with concise and informative titles.
Referred to in the text in numerical order.
Self-explanatory wherever possible.
Presented using consistent formatting.

Tables should not duplicate information already presented in figures or extensively discussed in the text.

Statistical significance indicators, abbreviations, and footnotes should be clearly explained below the table.

FIGURES

Figures should be of sufficient quality for publication and should be prepared in an appropriate electronic format.

Where applicable, figures should preferably be supplied at a resolution of at least 600 dpi for line art and an appropriate resolution for photographs and other raster images.

Figures should:

Be numbered consecutively.
Be cited in the manuscript.
Have clear labels and legends.
Be scientifically accurate.
Be legible after publication.

The preferred maximum figure size is approximately 18 x 15 cm, unless otherwise agreed with the editorial office.

Figure Captions

Figure captions should be concise but sufficiently detailed to allow the figure to be understood independently of the main text.

PHOTOGRAPHS

Photographs submitted for publication should be of high quality and sufficient resolution for reproduction.

Authors should ensure that:

Images are clear and appropriately exposed.
Identifying information is removed unless essential and consent has been obtained.
Patient photographs are accompanied by appropriate consent where applicable.
Image manipulation does not misrepresent the original findings.

Digital photographs should preferably be submitted in a high-resolution JPEG, TIFF, or other journal-accepted format.

EQUATIONS AND UNITS

Mathematical equations should be prepared using an appropriate equation editor or equivalent software.

Scientific notation and mathematical symbols should be clear and suitable for a multidisciplinary readership.

Authors should use SI units wherever applicable and maintain consistency throughout the manuscript.

Numerical data should be reported with an appropriate number of decimal places based on the precision of the measurement and statistical analysis.

All quantitative data should be accompanied by appropriate statistical analysis where applicable.

Manuscripts that do not meet essential formatting, ethical, or scientific requirements may be returned to authors for correction before further processing.

DECLARATIONS

The following declarations should be included immediately before the References section, where applicable.

Acknowledgements

Authors should acknowledge individuals, institutions, technical personnel, or other contributors who provided significant assistance but do not qualify for authorship.

Financial support should be acknowledged separately under the Funding section.

Conflict of Interest

All authors must declare any financial, commercial, academic, institutional, personal, or professional relationships that could influence or be perceived to influence the research.

If no conflict exists, authors may state:

"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest."

Author Contributions

The specific contributions of each author should be clearly stated.

For example:

Conceptualization
Methodology
Investigation
Data curation
Statistical analysis
Writing-original draft
Writing-review and editing
Supervision
Project administration

Funding

All sources of financial support should be disclosed.

Authors should provide the funding organization and grant/project number, where applicable.

If no specific funding was received, the authors may state:

"The authors received no specific funding for this study."

Ethics Statement

For studies involving human participants, animals, or human biological materials, the manuscript must provide the name of the relevant ethics committee or institutional review body and the approval/reference number, where applicable.

Informed Consent

Where applicable, the manuscript should state that informed consent was obtained from participants in accordance with applicable ethical standards.

For case reports, identifiable clinical information, or photographs, consent for publication should be obtained where required.

Data Availability Statement

Authors should provide a statement describing the availability of data underlying the findings.

Where datasets are deposited in a public repository, authors should provide:

Repository name
Dataset/accession number
DOI or persistent identifier, where available

Where data cannot be publicly shared because of ethical, privacy, legal, or other restrictions, the authors should clearly state the reason and describe how qualified researchers may request access, where appropriate.

REFERENCES

References should be cited in the manuscript using consecutive numerical citations in square brackets and listed in the same numerical order at the end of the manuscript.

Authors should ensure that every reference cited in the text appears in the reference list and that every reference in the reference list is cited in the text.

References should be accurate, complete, and preferably based on primary scientific literature.

Research Article

[1]. Grochulski P, Masson L, Borisova S, Pusztai MC, Schwarta JL, Brousseau R, Cygler M. (1995). Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A(a) insecticidal toxin: Crystal structure and channel formation. J Mol Biol. 254(2):447-464.

Research Article with DOI

[2]. Hamed A, Nedal A, Al-Mnayyis A, et al. (2020). COVID-19-Knowledge, attitude and practice among medical and non-medical university students in Jordan. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 14(1):17-24. doi:10.22207/JPAM.14.1.04.

Conference/Proceedings Paper

[3]. Estruch J, Warren GW, Mullins MA, Nye GJ, Craig JA, Joziel HG. (1996). Transgenic plants: An emerging approach to pest control. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA. 93:5369-5395.

Book

[4]. Winston JE. (1999). Describing Species. Columbia University Press, New York. p. 518.

Book Chapter

[5]. Stork N. (1997). Measuring global biodiversity and its decline. In: Reakakudla ML, Wilson DE, Wilson EO, editors. Biodiversity II. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC. p. 41-68.

Patent

Aviv H, Friedman K, Vered V. Submicron emulsions as ocular drug delivery vehicles. U.S. Patent US 5496811; 1996.

Website

Quick dissolving tablets. BioSpace. Available from: the official website. Accessed May 27, 2001.

Authors should verify all bibliographic information, including author names, article titles, journal names, volume, issue, page numbers, and DOI information, before submission.

ETHICS IN ANIMAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH

Authors conducting research involving animals or human participants must obtain approval from the appropriate ethics committee before commencing the study.

Animal research should comply with applicable international, national, and institutional regulations and recognized standards for laboratory animal care and use, including relevant institutional animal ethics requirements.

Human research should comply with applicable ethical principles, including the Declaration of Helsinki, as amended from time to time, where applicable.

The Methods section must include a clear statement regarding ethical approval and informed consent, where applicable.

ETHICAL CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE

For studies involving:

Patients
Human volunteers
Human biological materials
Experimental animals

authors may be required to submit a copy of the relevant Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approval certificate during the editorial process.

The ethics approval/reference number should also be included in the manuscript where applicable.

PROOFS

Authors of accepted manuscripts will receive page proofs electronically for final checking.

Proof corrections should be limited to:

Typographical errors
Formatting errors
Production errors
Other corrections necessary to accurately reproduce the accepted manuscript

Substantial additions, deletions, or changes to the scientific content should not normally be made at the proof stage.

Changes to authorship after acceptance are generally not permitted. In exceptional circumstances, any proposed change must be supported by a valid reason and written agreement from all affected authors and requires approval from the Editor-in-Chief.

EDITORIAL INTEGRITY AND RESEARCH MISCONDUCT

BEPLS is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.

Concerns involving plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabrication, falsification, inappropriate authorship, undisclosed conflicts of interest, unethical research practices, image manipulation, or other forms of research or publication misconduct may be investigated in accordance with applicable publication-ethics principles.

Where misconduct is confirmed, the journal may take appropriate action, including manuscript rejection, correction, retraction, expression of concern, or notification of relevant institutions or authorities, as appropriate.

AUTHOR RESPONSIBILITIES

Authors are responsible for:

Ensuring the originality and scientific integrity of their work.
Providing accurate and reproducible data.
Obtaining all necessary ethical approvals.
Obtaining informed consent where applicable.
Declaring conflicts of interest and funding sources.
Providing accurate references.
Ensuring appropriate authorship and contribution statements.
Responding appropriately to reviewer and editorial comments.
Correcting errors identified after publication when necessary.
Ensuring that the manuscript is not simultaneously submitted to another journal.

EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER

Publication of an article in BEPLS does not necessarily imply that the views, interpretations, conclusions, or recommendations expressed by the authors are endorsed by the journal, its editors, or the Academy for Environment and Life Sciences.

The responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the published content rests primarily with the authors.

ARTICLE PUBLICATION CHARGES

The Article Processing Charge (APC) covers the costs associated with manuscript processing, editorial and production services, DOI registration, online hosting, and other publication-related services.

The applicable publication processing charges are payable by the authors only after the manuscript has been accepted for publication.

FINAL SUBMISSION CHECKLIST

Before submitting a manuscript to BEPLS, authors should carefully verify that all required components have been completed.

Title Page

The title page should include:

Full title of the manuscript.
Full names of all authors.
Academic qualifications, where required.
Institutional affiliations and department.
Complete correspondence address.
Email address of the corresponding author.
Telephone/contact number.
Fax number, where applicable.
Short running title, where applicable.

Abstract

Abstract should be clear, concise, and preferably structured for original research articles.
The abstract should generally not exceed 250 words.

Keywords

Provide 3-7 relevant keywords immediately below the abstract.
Keywords should accurately reflect the major concepts and subject areas of the manuscript.

Main Manuscript

Ensure that the manuscript follows the journal's prescribed structure and formatting requirements.
Verify that all tables and figures are appropriately numbered and cited in the text.
Ensure that statistical methods are adequately described.
Confirm that ethical approval and informed consent statements are included where applicable.
Include the required declarations before the References section.

References

References must follow the citation and reference style specified in the BEPLS author guidelines.
Ensure that all references cited in the text appear in the reference list and vice versa.
Verify the accuracy of author names, journal titles, volume, issue, page numbers, and DOI information.

Additional Documents

Copyright/Publication Agreement, where required.
Cover Letter.
Ethics Committee approval certificate, where applicable.
Informed Consent statement/documentation, where applicable.
Conflict of Interest declaration.
Funding statement.
Author Contribution statement.
Data Availability statement, where applicable.

Authors should carefully review the complete manuscript and all supplementary documents before submission.

ARTICLE WITHDRAWAL POLICY

BEPLS is committed to maintaining high standards of scientific quality, publication ethics, and editorial integrity. The journal recognizes that, in exceptional circumstances, authors may request withdrawal of a manuscript after submission.

However, manuscript withdrawal after peer review or during production can result in considerable expenditure of time and resources by editors, reviewers, editorial staff, and production personnel. Therefore, authors are requested to carefully consider their decision before submitting a manuscript.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Withdrawal within 48 Hours

Authors may request withdrawal of a submitted manuscript within 48 hours of submission without a withdrawal charge, provided that the manuscript has not entered an advanced stage of editorial processing.

The withdrawal request should be submitted by the corresponding author.

Withdrawal After Peer Review or During Production

If an author requests withdrawal after completion or substantial progress of peer review, during the production stage, during early-release/ahead-of-publication processing, or after online publication, the journal may impose a withdrawal charge.

The corresponding author must provide a valid reason for the withdrawal request.

Extended Review Period

If a manuscript has remained under review for more than six months without acceptance or publication, the authors may request withdrawal without a withdrawal charge, subject to verification by the editorial office.

Withdrawal After Publication

Once an article has been formally published online, withdrawal is generally not permitted.

If an article is withdrawn after publication under exceptional circumstances, any Article Processing Charges already paid by the authors will not be refunded.

Where necessary, the journal may issue an appropriate editorial notice, correction, expression of concern, or retraction in accordance with publication-ethics principles.

Withdrawal During Advanced Editorial Processing

Withdrawal requests made when peer review is near completion or when substantial editorial and production work has already been undertaken may not normally be accepted unless the authors provide compelling and legitimate reasons.

Journal Indexing or Database Status

Changes in the indexing status of a journal or its inclusion/removal from a particular database are independent of the editorial decision concerning an individual manuscript.

The journal does not guarantee continued inclusion in any external indexing or abstracting database, as such decisions are made by the respective indexing organizations.

An article will not be withdrawn solely because the journal's indexing status changes.

Post-Acceptance Corrections

After acceptance and particularly after online publication, only legitimate editorial corrections, typographical corrections, factual corrections, or approved replacement of files may be considered.

Any post-publication correction will be handled according to the journal's editorial and publication-ethics procedures.

Withdrawal Charges

If an author requests withdrawal after peer review has commenced or after the manuscript has entered typesetting/production or has been published online, the withdrawal charge may be applied.

The withdrawal charge is intended to cover editorial, peer-review, administrative, and production resources already utilized in processing the manuscript.

Updated 12.10.2026